W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2011

Re: noted 3 issues re: time/data (was Re: minutes for HTML WG f2f, 2011-11-04, part 1)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:10:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4EC191C8.6000209@intertwingly.net>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
CC: public-html@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On 11/12/2011 07:51 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>
> Here is an iteration of the above issues based on your suggested improvements:
>
> 1. Enhance and simplify the time element. A change proposal to enhance
> and simplify the time element based on use-cases and needs documented
> to date:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/time_element
>
> 2. Add a data element. A change proposal to introduce a simple data
> element for use with microformats, microdata, RDFa based on use-cases
> of the general class of human vs. machine data publishing:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/data_element
>
> 3. Drop the pubdate attribute. A change proposal to drop the pubdate
> attribute as part of completing the removal of the Atom conversion
> algorithm which itself hasn't been a part of the W3C HTML5
> specification for over a year:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0000.html
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/drop_pubdate

The current state of these proposals is that they have less detail in 
the "Proposal Details" section than we normally require.  This is not a 
problem if there is no contention.  So the way I would like to proceed 
is to:

1) Open up three issues per the above, and so so before this week's telecon.

2) Immediately issue a Call for Consensus on all three change proposals.

3) Close by Amicable Consensus any issues for which we don't get 
pushback sufficient to convince the chairs that there will likely be a 
counter proposal.

4) Proceed with a normal call for consensus on whatever issues remain 
(if any).

Does anybody object to proceeding in this fashion?

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 22:10:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:41 GMT