W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Last Call decision poll

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:17:29 -0400
Message-ID: <4DDAC0D9.3090508@intertwingly.net>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
CC: 'Paul Cotton' <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html@w3.org, 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>, 'Philippe Le Hegaret' <plh@w3.org>, "'Michael(tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
On 05/23/2011 03:15 PM, John Foliot wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> I've posted my analysis of the results here:
>>
>> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2011/05/23/lastcall.html
>>
>> Anyone care to audit and verify my counts?
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Thanks for posting this, I will double check the math as well, and report
> if I note any issue. I note that you have extracted Member information
> from the archives that was not expressly captured in the survey itself
> (except when respondents specifically noted that they were answering
> personally of in an official capacity as part of their commentary).
>
> One point I wanted to be sure was clearly captured is that my personal
> vote on the surveys was that of an Invited Expert and not on behalf of
> Stanford University (where I am currently under contract) - lest there be
> any confusion. While I am closely associated to my work here over the past
> 5 years, I am expressly disallowed (per my contract) to comment publicly
> on behalf of the University.

You were indeed tallied as "(public) Invited expert", based on your 
affiliation information as present here:

http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=40318&public=1

> Cheers!
>
> JF

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 20:18:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:25 UTC