W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Last Call timeline

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:13:14 +0000
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E3EACD022300B94D88613639CF4E25F81A2CC40F@TK5EX14MBXC132.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> Has there been any consideration of entrance criteria for CR and PR? 

The Chairs and Team members have not yet had any discussions about Candidate Recommendation "call for implementations" [1].  Normally most WGs have this conversation when they are getting closer to finishing Last Call and we are still some way from that stage.  

But if you have any ideas on this I suggest you start a new email thread on "Call for implementation ideas" to get the discussion started.

/paulc

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#cfi 
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Graham
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 4:47 AM
To: public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Last Call timeline

On 05/16/2011 07:31 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>   The Chairs have been discussing with the W3C Team the need for a timeline for Last Call.

Has there been any consideration of entrance criteria for CR and PR? I understand that The Process gives some leeway here and it seems likely that the decisions made at LC will be influenced by, for example, whether we need two complete interoperable implementations of every feature, just two of each feature (possible spread over > 2
implementations) or something else, whether we take the relatively tight schedule in the charter seriously, and probably several other things.
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:13:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:31 GMT