W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Feedback on ISSUE-27 poll feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:51:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4D90A085.7040904@gmx.de>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 28.03.2011 16:29, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Julian Reschke, Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:55:25 +0200:
>> On 28.03.2011 15:49, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On 03/28/2011 09:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> On 28.03.2011 14:56, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>>> On 03/28/2011 08:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: chairs, please consider this feedback when deciding on ISSUE-27.
>>>>>
>>>>> The poll is still open. Please take this opportunity to update your
>>>>> responses as you see fit. Feel free to include a link to your email in
>>>>> your response.
>>>>
>>>> This works for survey feedback on Change Proposals, but not for feedback
>>>> on other people's feedback.
>>>
>>> Why not? Others have done such in the past. When they have done so,
>>> their feedback has been taken into consideration.
>>> ...
>>
>> I'm not sure how to do that.
>>
>> If I want to comment on a somebody else feedback on my own change
>> proposal, where do I put that?
>>
>> I note this WG has an issue tracker that tracks mailing list
>> discussions when labeled properly. We should take advantage of that.
>
> You stated in [1] that what Ian described as a problem is "a feature".
> Therefore you could perhaps state about the opposite proposal that it
> lacks that feature?
>
> My $0.2

I did (and did before).

This works sometimes, but not always (such as in other discussions, with 
unfortunate results).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 28 March 2011 14:52:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:26 GMT