- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:30:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- cc: public-html@w3.org, PSIG <member-psig@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote: > > > > I've made the point here before that "permission to do X" is not the > > legal equivalent of "restriction on doing ~X". > > The fact that W3C claims a copyright on the document does add a whole > lot of explicit restrictions though, right? It's more explicit than that, even. The license in question [1] imports by reference the W3C Document license [2] which says, amongst other things, "No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is granted pursuant to this license". The license in question then adds three specific allowances, all specifically about software. Meanwhile, the GPL is applicable to all copyrightable works, not just software. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0143.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 At least, that's how Google sees this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:30:43 UTC