W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Option 3

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:05:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=+seX==nCmMY--veYgXWgk6jo35j5XB_qKSo7N@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: mjs@apple.com, lrosen@rosenlaw.com, public-html@w3.org, member-psig@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Maciej, haven't you been on vacation?  :-)
>
> You might want to recheck...

Sam, can you clarify this. Are you saying that the FSF lawyers have
reviewed the Option 3 license or the MIT license? And if so, that they
concluded that it was GPL compatible?

If any review of the Option 3 license have occurred and FSF has made a
public statement about it, do you have a link to this statement?

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 23:06:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:26 GMT