W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

2nd CfC: Close ISSUE-148 charset-detect by Amicable Resolution

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:44:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4D823A62.7090502@intertwingly.net>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/11/2011 07:37 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 12:04 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> The current status for this issue:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/148
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-148
>>
>> - We have a change proposal to change the algorithm for extracting an
>> encoding from a Content-Type.
>>
>> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit any other alternate
>> Change Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details),
>> in case anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different
>> change than the specific one in the existing Change Proposals.
>>
>> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by March
>> 10th, 2011, we will proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we have
>> received to date.
>
> As we have received no counter-proposals or alternate proposals, the
> chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the proposal that we do have.
> If no objections are raised to this call by March 18th 2011, we will
> direct the editor to make the proposed change. If anybody would like to
> raise an objection during this time, we strongly encourage them to
> accompany their objection with a concrete and complete change proposal.

Since that time, we have received a new proposal:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0274.html

And the original proposal has been withdrawn:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0329.html

We would like to once again issue a call for consensus, this time on the 
new proposal.  If no objections are raised to this call by March 24th 
2011, we will close this issue by amicable consensus. If anybody would 
like to raise an objection during this time, we strongly encourage them 
to either endorse the now withdrawn change proposal, or accompany their 
objection with a new concrete and complete change proposal.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 16:45:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:23 UTC