W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

RE: F2F (was RE: Change proposal for issue 152)

From: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:05:19 -0700
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
CC: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <114DAD31379DFA438C0A2E39B3B8AF5D017C2BC223@srvxchg>
First thing Sunday morning sounds good. How firm is this?

Bob Lund

-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Silvia Pfeiffer
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:29 PM
To: Mark Watson
Cc: John Foliot; Frank Olivier; Philip Jägenstedt; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: F2F (was RE: Change proposal for issue 152)

That's not a bad idea. Maybe first thing in the morning on Sunday?

Also, if I may propose the following rough approach to the discussion:
1. Review of use cases
2. JS API for in-band and manifests
3. HTML markup for external tracks
4. CSS and rendering

Then maybe we can focus Sunday on writing change proposals, which would fit well with Mark's request for a checkpoint.
I actually expect several change proposals, but we will see.


On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
> I wonder if, given the closeness of the meeting to the March 22nd deadline, it might make sense to explicitly schedule one session, perhaps on Sunday morning, for others to dial in where you could summarize the progress so far and check on the current favorite approach. A kind of "checkpoint" to increase the chance that whatever is proposed as output of the meeting is acceptable to more people ?
> ...Mark
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 1:59 AM, John Foliot wrote:
>> Mark Watson wrote:
>>>> ...hope you can join us remotely for at least part of the session(s).
>>> Do you know when, specifically, this issue will be discussed ?
>> Hi Mark,
>> My sense at this time is that this is one of the primary issues we 
>> hope to work out at the face-to-face. We will likely start on this 
>> from the top, which means we will get rolling around 9:00 AM Pacific 
>> on March 19th. We will probably look at other issues as well, but 
>> they have not been scheduled at this time. I will be sure to keep all 
>> advised as best I can via this list, but acknowledge that scheduling will be loose.
>> Cheers!
>> JF
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:13:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:10 UTC