- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:44:36 -0800 (PST)
- To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, "'Philippe Le Hegaret'" <plh@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > In this case, no other bugs or issues would be closed as a side effect. > > Other existing or new bugs can continue to be processed as well. As a follow-up, this was also discussed on the larger TF call today, and from that came this: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/108 > > All that would be closed is ISSUE-9 itself, since the more specific > bugs and issues remove the need for this placeholder umbrella issue. Thanks for the clarification. I believe then that all is good to go, and that none of the members of the media sub-team have a problem with closing this Issue. > P.S. bug 10693 is in the inconsistent state of being reopened and also > marked TrackerIssue. I believe one of the following would be > appropriate: > > (1) Remove TrackerIssue, and leave the bug open until the editor > resolves it again. > (2) Put the bug back in "resolved" state and mark as TrackerRequest, to > raise a new issue specifically about navigation between related timed > tracks. > > Please let the chairs know which of these is intended, or make the > change yourself. Changed to option 2 Cheers! JF
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 21:45:12 UTC