W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

RE: ISSUE-9 video-accessibility: Call for Consensus to close in favor of specific issues, or Alternate/Counter-Proposals

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:44:36 -0800 (PST)
To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, "'Philippe Le Hegaret'" <plh@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02d101cbd9ec$30f2f850$92d8e8f0$@edu>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> 
> In this case, no other bugs or issues would be closed as a side effect.
> 
> Other existing or new bugs can continue to be processed as well.

As a follow-up, this was also discussed on the larger TF call today, and
from that came this:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/108


> 
> All that would be closed is ISSUE-9 itself, since the more specific
> bugs and issues remove the need for this placeholder umbrella issue.

Thanks for the clarification. I believe then that all is good to go, and
that none of the members of the media sub-team have a problem with closing
this Issue.


> P.S. bug 10693 is in the inconsistent state of being reopened and also
> marked TrackerIssue. I believe one of the following would be
> appropriate:
> 
> (1) Remove TrackerIssue, and leave the bug open until the editor
> resolves it again.
> (2) Put the bug back in "resolved" state and mark as TrackerRequest, to
> raise a new issue specifically about navigation between related timed
> tracks.
> 
> Please let the chairs know which of these is intended, or make the
> change yourself.

Changed to option 2

Cheers!

JF
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 21:45:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:23 GMT