W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:36:51 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwiOL8VmAFH0d+RT_8-tWde66tHXJ_=Ob0YW1z@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, public-rdfa@w3.org
's/support/vehement support'

On 2 March 2011 23:20, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 04:23 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>>
>> So instead of formalising my own proposal, I'd like to express my
>> support for RDFaPrefixesNoChange.
>
> For those who have recently joined the group, I'd like to draw your
> attention to a standard part of every survey we issue (example[1]):
>
>   This is not a popularity contest. The Working Group Decision
>   will be based on the strength of objections, not the number
>   of people expressing them.
>
>> Cheers,
>> Danny.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/#wbsq1
>



-- 
http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 23:37:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:23 UTC