W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-126: charset-vs-backslashes - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:03:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6EA280.90001@intertwingly.net>
To: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 03/02/2011 02:53 PM, Philip J├Ągenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:31:23 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> wrote:
>
>> ISSUE-126: charset-vs-quotes - Straw Poll for Objections
>>
>> The poll is available here and it will run through Thursday Mar 10th:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/
>>
>> Please read the introductory text before entering your response.
>>
>> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only
>> need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is
>> truly strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly
>> marked objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone
>> else's objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of
>> objections, and will not be counting votes.
>
> The description and link to
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0300.html> for
> Julian's CP seems to be copy-pasted from ISSUE-125, is this a mistake or
> have the issues been merged?

The descriptions are similar (suggestions welcome!).  The link was 
incorrect.  It has now been corrected.  The correct link is:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0234.html

Thanks for reporting this!

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 20:03:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:23 GMT