W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: rel=archives

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:37:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6E6426.1050108@intertwingly.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/02/2011 08:39 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 02.03.2011 14:19, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 03/02/2011 03:28 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> On 01.03.2011 08:25, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> However, it seems that the accepted proposal suggests not changing a
>>>>> few of the relations about what the ISSUE originally was opened; we
>>>>> may have to revisit them.
>>>>
>>>> The Change Proposal adopted is
>>>> this:<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0042.html>.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Its Details section says:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Remove all prose relating to the following link types: index, up,
>>>>>>> first, last.
>>>>
>>>> This would include, by my understanding, removal of the Synonyms
>>>> sections of those definitions, which include the synonyms "top",
>>>> "contents", "toc", "begin", "start" and "end".
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Sigh.
>>>
>>> So the Ian has also removed the relation "archives", which was a
>>> separate bug, not discussed at all, and already is in the IANA registry.
>>>
>>> See <http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5924&to=5925>.
>>>
>>> I believe this change doesn't increase consensus, also is not subject to
>>> the WG decision, and thus should be reverted.
>>
>> I don't follow this logic.
>>
>> From a process perspective, you are claiming that Ian made a change
>> that is not subject to the WG decision, was not discussed at all, and
>> yet was a separate bug. In the first case, it is unclear to me why you
>> are choosing to report such in a reply thread to the decision. In the
>  > ...
>
> Because the change was made as a result of the WG decision for
> ISSUE-128. See <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11486#c5>:
>
> "Rationale: I removed it entirely, based on the precedent the chairs
> established for rel=index."

Thanks for pointing out the bug associated with this change.  We will 
investigate.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 15:37:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:23 UTC