W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

Re: ISSUE-133 modal-attribute - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:30:12 -0700
Cc: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <F66EE766-954D-488F-9D56-9CAC72EA1582@apple.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>

On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:

> Again I make the point, no one expects implementors to take and run with the first pass at speccing the feature behaviour, its a starting point from which expert minds can develop and mature the feature until it is ready to implement. I just want to see something down on writing in the spec  to get the ball rolling.

Hi Steve,

It sounds to me like, at this stage, no one is objecting to putting something in the spec. It seems to me that Ted wants a little extra time to make a more fleshed-out proposal that covers some of these details. So far, no one has expressed interest in a zero-change proposal. So assuming that remains the case, the use case will end up covered, and probably quite early in the Last Call cycle. Perhaps if you like where Ted goes with his proposal, the two of you could consider collaborating, since it sounds like you have roughly the same goals in mind.

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 23:30:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:14 UTC