W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

Re: REVERT REQUEST for "crossorigin" attribute

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:36:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4E0387AC.5050109@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 2011-06-23 20:10, Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> As an example, I do see "WebGL has some major security issues and this
> change is nothing more than addressing the tip of the ice berg while
> ignoring the rest. I think it is more dangerous to add than not.", but
> if that is more of a position than an argument. Please explain why you
> think it is dangerous, with specifics. Furthermore, it is not clear that
> WebGL is the only intended beneficiary for this change.
> ...

a) I'm proxying, as you know.

b) How would I know what the "intended beneficiaries" are when there is 
no discussion about the feature?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 18:37:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:33 GMT