W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

Re: CfC addendum: Status wording for HTML5 Edition for Web Authors

From: Doug Jones <doug_b_jones@me.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:04:02 -0400
Message-id: <651278E8-F791-49E7-A287-E5B763523DC4@me.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>

On 2011 Jun 14, at 02:45, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> 
> Option 1
> 
> "This document is an automated redaction of the full HTML5 specification. As such, the two documents are supposed to agree on normative matters concerning Web authors. However, if the documents disagree, this is a bug in the redaction process and the unredacted full HTML specification takes precedence. Readers are encouraged to report such discrepancies as bugs in the bug tracking system of the HTML WG."
> 
Agree to Option 1.
> 
> Option 2
> 
> "These two specifications are generated from common base text and are intended to be entirely consistent. Both are normative and authoritative. With respect to any matters on which they (unexpectedly) disagree, there is a bug in at least one, and neither specification is authoritative with respect to the point(s) of disagreement. In such cases we expect to resolve the bug by publishing versions that are changed to be consistent."
> 
Disagree with Option 2 for similar reasons as stated by others replying before me.

Doug Jones
> 
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 14:04:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:33 GMT