W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

RE: Normative status of author-only view of the HTML5 specification

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:41:44 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E3EACD022300B94D88613639CF4E25F81AB76C6A@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> Given that we would then have two documents with normative status describing how HTML is defined. Which of the two is authoritative if the two don't agree?

Our goal is have the two documents agree - the author-only view is generated directly from the HTML5 spec.

/paulc 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 19:43:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:33 GMT