W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

[Bug 12891] New: to RDF conversion should seriously be in agreement with schema.org?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:36:31 +0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-12891-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12891

           Summary: to RDF conversion should seriously be in agreement
                    with schema.org?
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: pre-LC1 HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: giovanni.tummarello@deri.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Schema.org using microdata shows an RDF which makes sense (e.g. the URIs are
correctly the same as those poposed on schema.org)see
http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html the RDFa example (just convert it to rdf)

but if the proposed algorithm is used the URIS would be really strange and
incompatible with these.

"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/microdata#http://example.com/a%23:q%20r".

it is really important to fix this algorithm since we do need implementations
asap also driven by schema.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2011 19:36:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:33 GMT