Re: ISSUE-163 navigating-tracks: Chairs Solicit Change Proposals

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> OK, the second is not true. But if you're doing it like this, why bother
> with cues at all? Wouldn't it be cleaner to have *only* a root <nav> with
> possible <nav> children? Using ranges for some chapters and cues for other
> is not very appealing, IMO.

Agreed.  The markup in the wiki is very confusing, imo, since
top-level chapters are indicated in a completely different way from
subchapters.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 18:56:37 UTC