W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11879] New: Is the setting and getting of the "original insertion mode" here needed. It seems like the "in table text" insertion mode can only be reached from the "in table" insertion mode, which would then always be the "original insertion mode"?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:32:29 +0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11879-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11879

           Summary: Is the setting and getting of the "original insertion
                    mode" here needed. It seems like the "in table text"
                    insertion mode can only be reached from the "in table"
                    insertion mode, which would then always be the
                    "original insertion mode"?
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#par
                    sing-main-intabletext
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/tokenization.html
Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#parsing-main-intabletext

Comment:
Is the setting and getting of the "original insertion mode" here needed. It
seems like the "in table text" insertion mode can only be reached from the "in
table" insertion mode, which would then always be the "original insertion
mode"?

Posted from: 82.169.30.12

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 19:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:22 UTC