W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: review of hgroup element prior to last call.

From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:20:18 -0000
To: "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vpsz301th8on37@bruce-pc>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:33:23 -0000, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
wrote:


> 2) I personally think polls are more effective when they are based on  
> tangible and concrete proposals complete with rationale.  That being  
> said, if somebody were to draft up a poll, and there is sufficient  
> interest expressed in having such a poll (my personal rule of thumb  
> remains "three independent people expressing support, and more people  
> saying yes than no"), then it would likely happen.


I too should like <hgroup>'s inclusion reviewed again; many web developers  
have expressed confusion over its role to me. (I wrote it up here  
http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2010/on-the-hgroup-element/)

Bruce

(Personal opinion; not representing Opera)
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 08:21:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:20 GMT