W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: rationale for inclusion of hgroup in html5?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:24:46 +0100
To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.vpsbbj1264w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:57:43 +0100, Steve Faulkner  
<faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> there must be more than this right? anybody have pointers to anything,  
> data maybe on current use of headings for subheadings, any data on use  
> of class or id names to identify subheadings titles etc?

The pattern is extremely frequent on e.g. TR/ e.g.  
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/ The way <hgroup> is designed now it could be  
readily applied to lots of W3C specifications. Having said that, I think  
we should change it per James' bug.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 23:25:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:08 UTC