RE: Issue 129 counter proposal

A counter proposal [1] for issue 129 was sent to the html wg on monday 17th
jan
it raised a concern in regards to bug 10903, to which i responded[2]
can the chairs acknowledge that this is acceptable?


Also I would like to request that the chairs do not proceed with Issue 129
until the accessibility taskforce subteam have had time to review and modify
our original proposal in response to the counter proposal, we see some areas
where agreement can be reached.
Furthermore there has been a new bug posted which indicates that new
information may have an affect on Issue 129 [3]. It would be useful to know
if indeed this is the case and when details will be forthcoming. I have
requested a response about timimg, but to no avail, maybe the chairs will
have better luck.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0147.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0148.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com |
www.HTML5accessibility.com<http://www.html5accessibility.com/>|
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html