W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: CfC: close ISSUE-126 charset-vs-backslashes by amicable resolution

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 04:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1101190433050.28618@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> Julian, your change proposal claims that this is not needed for
> interoperability. Do you have any data showing this other than the
> fact that webkit-based browsers and opera does not implement this?

That's actually not a fact. The browsers are pretty consistent in their 
handling of backslashes -- none of them do what Julian's CP proposes, 
they all just treat them the same as any other punctuation:

   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10806#c10

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:21 UTC