On 01/17/2011 06:02 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 17.01.2011 23:46, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 11/30/2010 03:28 PM, Paul Cotton wrote: >>> ISSUE-138 (mutate-action): "mutate action" for issueing a GET request >>> is misleading. >>> >>> Per the decision policy, at this time the Chairs would like to solicit >>> volunteers to write Change Proposals for ISSUE-138: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/138 >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation >>> >>> If no Change Proposals are written by January 12, 2011 this issue will >>> be closed without prejudice. >>> >>> Issue status link: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-138 >> >> As no change proposals have been received, this issue has been marked as >> closed without prejudice. > > Actually, a CP was sent 5 days ago, and the editor already made a change > (see > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-diffs/2011Jan/0079.html>). My bad. Thanks for catching it. In that case, I take it that both you are Ian are satisfied with this change. If nobody objects, this issue will be closed on January 25, 2011. > Best regards, Julian - Sam RubyReceived on Monday, 17 January 2011 23:24:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:18 GMT