W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-124: rel-limits - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:34:38 +0100
To: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vrmgbzia64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:50:36 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> The spec will need to deal with this anyway; I think the best  
> *authoring* advice is not to shoot yourself in the foot: just define the  
> link relations on the link in a single place. This even could be made a  
> conformance requirement.

Then we could also make the processing per-link, rather than the current  
concept.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 16:35:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT