W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-160 menuless-commands: Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:08:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4D665832.6060407@intertwingly.net>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/22/2011 02:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 01/22/2011 02:00 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:53:05 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
>> wrote:
>>> 'Remove restriction on command element as part of a menu '
>>>
>>> Per the decision policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit
>>> volunteers to write Change Proposals.
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/160
>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
>>>
>>> If no Change Proposals are written by February 23rd, 2011 this issue
>>> will be closed without prejudice.

As no change proposals were received, this issue has been closed without 
prejudice.

>>> Issue status link:
>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-160
>>
>> Nobody ever got back to the question Ian raised in the bug where this
>> issue originated:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8673
>>
>> He resolved it NEEDSINFO, not WONTFIX. Why was this issue created?
>
> Take a close look at steps 2 and 4 of the process:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic
>
> The practical effect of raising this as an issue is that those that wish
> to pursue this issue have precisely until February 23rd to answer
> exactly the question that Ian posed, and at no time is amicable
> resolution eliminated as a possibility.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> P.S. I suspect that the timing was motivated by the schedule:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 13:08:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:22 UTC