W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Solicitation of objections (was: premature resolution of bug 11984)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:49:29 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik2YUSgauYfYveCADvQn_RTMb__2Kb45oAtxQSi@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 05:33 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> On 05.02.2011 02:31, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I think it is a separate issue. As such, I've filed a bug for Philip:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984
>>>
>>> Ok, fixed.
>>> ...
>>
>> I disagree with this resolution, and therefor ask the chairs to instruct
>> the editor to revert the changes.
>>
>> To those who didn't follow before: this introduces media type sniffing
>> for <video>.
>
> At this point, the chairs are asking the WG if anyone else wants to see this
> reverted.  If you have a technical (i.e., non-procedural) objection to the
> approach taken by the resolution to this bug, we are asking you to indicate
> such by adding a brief comment to bug itself.

Should people that support this change also voice their support? It
seems hard to gauge if the change increased or decreased consensus
otherwise. (I don't have enough data to have a strong opinion on this,
but I would imagine other people at mozilla might).

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 23:50:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:22 UTC