W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-122 shalott-example: Call for revisions

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:29:50 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=A-M+ed14s+Y0K3=WTxf57d_x65iPKornhqnss@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Maciej,

> The original definition of the issue only appears to
> cover the first of these questions, not 2

Question number 2: <Img> Definition Question: "What verbiage should
HTML5 use for the first two paragraphs of the img element definition?"
[1] is covered by pre-last call bug 9098 which has the TrackerIssue
keyword.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9098

I wrote change proposals for it last spring [2] [3] for Issue 31 as it
is in the same design space as the alt issue. Ian addressed it in his
change proposal for Issue 31 in July [4].

If that question does not belong with Issue 31 why didn't the chairs
tell us last spring or summer?

> All right, the chairs will discuss the applicability of this proposal to ISSUE-31.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Laura

--
Laura L. Carlson
[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElementSurveyConformaceChoices#2._.3CImg.3E_Definition_Question:_.22What_verbiage_should_HTML5_use_for_the_first_two_paragraphs_of_the_img_element_definition.3F.22
[2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20100504
[3] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20100510
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0050.html
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 23:30:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT