- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:20:40 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Maciej, > * Laura's proposal to remove text alternative examples goes considerably > beyond the scope of the issue, in the judgment of the chairs > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/TextAlternativesIssue122>. > The original scope of the issue was about the details of one particular > example. This proposal removes all accessibility advice for textual > equivalents, and in the course of doing so entirely deletes a WG draft. It > is reasonable to propose this, but not as part of this narrow issue. We > offer the following options: > > ** Revise the Change Proposal to fit the narrower scope of ISSUE-122 > (just the one example that was at issue). > > ** File a bug requesting the changes in the proposal, and if necessary > escalate it. It will then be treated as its own issue. > > It's fine to do either or both of these things (or none if there is no > desire to pursue the issue further). Can my proposal for issue 122 proposal be considered for issue 31 instead? It would seem to fit in the scope of the third question of that issue: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElementSurveyConformaceChoices#3._Text_Alternative_Examples_Question:_.22Where.2Fwho_will_define_requirements_on_the_possible_values_of_text_alternatives_examples.3F.22 Thanks. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 20:21:14 UTC