W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Call for a poll of the html wg on removal of hgroup was Re: review of hgroup element prior to last call.

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:27:08 -0800
Cc: 'Steve Faulkner' <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, 'Paul Cotton' <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 'HTMLWG WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'Sam Ruby' <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-id: <0F07AD60-5AE7-42C1-9CFB-7ED9A00D3B72@apple.com>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>

On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:16 AM, John Foliot wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> That's definitely the case, and we intent to apply the decision policy
>> as usual. If the bug report on this ends up escalated to a tracker
>> issue, we will treat it as a Last Call issue.  All I'm saying is that
>> we do not intend to do anything special outside the bounds of the usual
>> process.
> Given the scope of the topic being discussed (should <hgroup> remain) it
> seems that this is beyond just a simple bug, and so it needs to be
> escalated as an issue, then sit back and wait for it to be addressed in
> due course - is that correct Maciej?
> Steve, do you care to do the honors?

So far, the editor hasn't resolved the bug yet, and it's been less than 30 days. If the bug gets rejected, or if it sits unaddressed for an overly long time, it would be fine to escalate it to an issue.

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:09 UTC