W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2011

New Editor's Drafts of RDFa Lite 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:18:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4EFF35BC.4070504@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
There are two new Editors Drafts for RDFa Lite 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1.

RDFa Lite 1.1
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-lite/

HTML+RDFa 1.1
http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/

Changes for RDFa Lite 1.1:

* Cleaned up the conformance section to make normative statements about
   what constitutes an RDFa Lite 1.1 Document. This establishes RDFa Lite
   as a REC track document.
* Removed processor conformance and user agent conformance sections
   since RDFa Lite is about a subset of RDFa syntax. Processor
   conformance and user agent conformance is defined in RDFa Core and
   the Host Language documents.
* Removed the dependency on the HTML5 spec so that RDFa Lite can be
   applied to other Host Languages while simultaneously making HTML5+RDFa
   depend on the RDFa Lite spec.

Changes for HTML+RDFa 1.1:

* Created a dependency to the RDFa Lite specification so that there are
   clear document conformance rules for HTML+RDFa 1.1 and HTML+RDFa Lite
   1.1
* Added language to allow LINK and META elements in the body of a
   document if they contain RDFa attributes. This is to bring HTML+RDFa
   in line with the HTML Data Task Force's desire to have META and LINK
   allowed in the body (which Microdata also allows).
* Added support for the @datetime and @value attributes.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout
http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2011 16:18:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:42 GMT