W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2011

Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip by Amicable Resolution

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:19:05 +0100
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.v6k8t3g764w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:59:18 +0100, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> I object to carrying through with that change proposal.
>
> I will not be writing a concrete and complete counter proposal -- because
> the original bug should ever have been escalated to begin with, and in my
> assessment does not merit continued attention from other members of the
> group nor the W3C Team. We all have more important issues to deal with  
> that are genuine priorities that do actually merit our collective time  
> and
> attention, and bugs/comments like this one are a distraction from getting
> work done on those real issues.
>
> The right way to have dealt with this would have been for the original  
> bug to have been judged to be something best left up to editorial  
> discretion.

I second this objection. This also goes for the code point bug/issue/cfc.  
If decisions are to be made on either of those, it should not happen here  
in the HTML WG as many other drafts would be affected as well. And  
frankly, I think we have better things to worry about than whether a  
reference is work in progress or not when the document itself is work in  
progress.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 15:22:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:42 GMT