W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2011

Re: HTML.next and Rechartering

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:07:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4E4460A3.4020809@intertwingly.net>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 08/11/2011 06:21 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> We could, for example, right now split out all those
> features that are stable

Again, I encourage you to make specific proposals, starting with bug 
reports.

> So, while I sympathize with the spirit of the W3C process, I think our
> execution of it is rather unsatisfactory and I feel unable to make an
> informed decision on whether the HTML specification in its
> completeness should actually move forward in the maturity or not. I
> want it to move forward, but at the same time I want to really hold
> back on large parts of it. This is why I'm not able to vote on such a
> decision.

In the short term, nothing will change unless people start making 
concrete proposals as to what they want to see taken out of the document.

That being said, in the long term what you are describing is exactly 
what will happen as features for which we can't demeonstrate 
interoperability will have to be jettisoned later in the process.

So: you can be a part of the process and help things along; or you can 
simply wait and we will end up in the same place anyway.  We just will 
get there sooner (and with a lot less wasted effort) if people like you 
identify what parts should be effectively held back -- I say this as 
removal from HTML5 will not make such features ineligible for inclusion 
in HTML.next.

I encourage you to participate.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 23:09:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:37 GMT