W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2011

CfC: Close ISSUE-154 link-external by Amicable Resolution

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:42:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4E395E6A.3040307@intertwingly.net>
To: HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
One again (sorry!) correcting the subject line.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: CfC: Close ISSUE-153 link-external by Amicable Resolution
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:41:05 +0000
Resent-From: public-html@w3.org
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:40:27 -0400
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To: public-html@w3.org

On 07/24/2011 11:25 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
> REMINDER:  If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by July 28th, 2011, we proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we have received to date.

Current status: we have received an updated Change Proposal with an
updated rationale section:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Aug/0131.html

As we have received no acceptable counter-proposals or alternate
proposals, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the proposal
that we do have.  If anybody would like to raise an objection during
this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a
concrete and complete change proposal.

If no objections are raised to this call by August 10th 2011, we will
direct the editor to make the proposed change, and will only consider
subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a
complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists after 
this change is applied.

- Sam Ruby

> /paulc
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:02 AM
> To: HTML WG LIST
> Subject: ISSUE-154 link-sidebar - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals
>
> '"sidebar" might not be a proper use of a link relation'
>
> The current status for this issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/154
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-154
>
> At the present time we have one change proposal to remove link type
> "sidebar":
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0326.html
>
> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit additional Change Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in case anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different change than the specific one in the existing Change Proposals.
>
> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by July 28th, 2011, we proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we have received to date.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 14:43:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:27 UTC