- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:37:30 -0700
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-html@w3.org
On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: >> On 2011-04-28 23:27, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> >>> On 4/28/11 1:33 PM, Paul Cotton wrote: >>>> >>>> PLEASE NOTE THAT UNLIKE MANY OTHER WG SURVEYS THIS IS A PREFERENCE >>>> POLL AND WE ENCOURAGE ALL WG MEMBERS TO INDICATE THEIR LICENSE >>>> PREFERENCE. >>> >>> For organizations, should there be one vote per organization or however >>> many participants in the working group the organization has? I'd assumed >>> the former but the "all wg members" thing is confusing me. >> >> Since it's an merely an opinion poll to be used as feedback to the PSIG, and >> is not a binding vote, I assume (and hope) we answer individually, rather >> than only once per member organisation. > > Do invited experts have a say? Yes. (Invited experts always have a say, regardless of whether it is an individual or organizational poll). Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 01:37:59 UTC