- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:11:27 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 04/26/2011 05:58 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > While some sort of accommodation for input relating to additional > options is likely to be in the next draft of the poll; a specific option > for MIT is not likely to be included as we have yet to have somebody > specifically advocate for that option. On 04/25/2011 05:33 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Specifically, I > expect poll survey from Apple representatives would support an MIT > license but not CC0. You may not consider this as "advocacy" but it is enough to suggest that including CC0 (which has clearly been advocated) but not MIT (which has merely been "supported") would result in significant information loss.
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 16:11:58 UTC