W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:53:35 -0700
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110425225335.GA32617@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2011-04-25 20:39 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote:
> >My substantive comment is that I feel like I either need an option that says:
> > ( ) I can live with this option as long as the specification
> >     continues to be published at whatwg.org under a more liberal
> >     license; otherwise I cannot live with this license.
> >or clearer instructions on whether responders should assume that simultaneous publication at the WHATWG will continue.
> 
> I believe the current survey (with radio buttons for each choice)
> would permit you to select your response for a license and then to
> provide any caveats in the Rationale field.  Does that meet your
> needs?

It does if it's clear which set of assumptions the survey is
assuming, that is, whether I should assume continued whatwg
publication when choosing the radio buttons and explain in the
comments how I'd respond given the lack of continued whatwg
publication, or the other way around.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 22:54:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:28 GMT