W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:53:35 -0700
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110425225335.GA32617@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2011-04-25 20:39 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote:
> >My substantive comment is that I feel like I either need an option that says:
> > ( ) I can live with this option as long as the specification
> >     continues to be published at whatwg.org under a more liberal
> >     license; otherwise I cannot live with this license.
> >or clearer instructions on whether responders should assume that simultaneous publication at the WHATWG will continue.
> I believe the current survey (with radio buttons for each choice)
> would permit you to select your response for a license and then to
> provide any caveats in the Rationale field.  Does that meet your
> needs?

It does if it's clear which set of assumptions the survey is
assuming, that is, whether I should assume continued whatwg
publication when choosing the radio buttons and explain in the
comments how I'd respond given the lack of continued whatwg
publication, or the other way around.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 22:54:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:12 UTC