RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

In Sam's Ruby's note [1] of February 2009, there were some use cases included that managed to drop out of the list being offered currently [2]. Is the omission intentional or accidental?

curious,
David


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0388.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2011/03/html-license-options.html

________________________________
From: public-html-request@w3.org [public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton [Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 4:09 PM
To: public-html@w3.org
Cc: Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)
Subject: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

On March 31, the HMTL WG chairs announced the opening of a discussion period on three HTML5 licensing options [1] offered to the WG by the W3C Management and Team.  That discussion period was to be followed by a one week survey of the WG on the three licensing options starting on April 28.

At the Weekly WG meeting on Thu Apr 21 the Chairs were asked what type of survey they would be carrying out on this topic.  The Chairs have drafted a survey on the three licensing options which is available for review at [2].

Please provide any comments on the structure and instructions on this draft licensing survey in response to this message.  The Chairs will evaluate this input before posting the final survey.

/paulc

PS: Note that the draft survey is NOT open yet and WG members can review the structure and questions but you CANNOT yet provide answers.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0757.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/html5-license-poll/

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

Received on Saturday, 23 April 2011 02:07:35 UTC