W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:30:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4D9EF1C3.6070506@intertwingly.net>
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
CC: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On 04/08/2011 05:56 AM, James Graham wrote:
>
> I thought that was the reason for *URIs*, not prefixes.

The bug[1] was opened eighteen months ago.  The issue[2] six months ago. 
  The call for proposals[3] was four months ago.  The survey[4] was one 
month ago.

James, if your goal is to get this working group to repeat the same 
discussions over and over, the job of the chairs is an easy one: we will 
simply shut the discussion down.

We will get you an answer on your question of what would constitute new 
information next week[5].  Until then, I ask you to focus just on one 
question: what would constitute new information in the context of this 
issue?

- Sam Ruby

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670
[2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/120
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Dec/0065.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0255.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0166.html
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 11:30:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:27 GMT