W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:12:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9D9C2F.6050807@opera.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

On 04/07/2011 01:07 PM, James Graham wrote:
> Given the above, it is difficult to see a path by which the current RDFa
> spec can be made to match reality.

Apologies, I meant to say "a path by which reality can be made to match 
the current RDFa spec".

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:13:21 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: role="subheading" or role="subtitle" to replace hgroup"
Previous message: James Graham: "Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes"
In reply to: James Graham: "Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes"
Next in thread: Sam Ruby: "Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:27 GMT