W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10844] New: Mono ruby, group ruby, and jukugo ruby

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:44:23 +0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10844-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10844

           Summary: Mono ruby, group ruby, and jukugo ruby
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


There are three styles of Japanese ruby, as shown in the W3C JLReq
(http://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#en-subheading2_3).  They are mono ruby, group
ruby, and jukugo ruby.  It is not clear which of these three styles can be
represented in HTML5.

Location in reviewed document:
4.6.18 The ruby element
[http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100624/text-level-semantics.html#the-ruby-element]

There are two sources of information.

    * An e-mail to the public-html-ig-jp@w3.org by Roland Steiner (the author
of the current WebKit implementation of ruby) shows how to capture
mono/group/jukugo ruby in HTML5. 

    * Ruby use cases from the JLReq document shows how HTML5 and and Ruby
Annotation (XHTML) can be used for capturing mono, group, and jukugo ruby. 

More about this, see
http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/EGLS_solutions#Solutions_to_Ruby_and_Emphasis_Dots


Please incorporate information from these sources to HTML5 and make clear which
style of ruby is supported.  I think that the examples in the current HTML5
spec is jukugo ruby.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 00:44:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC