W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: CfC: Publish eight heartbeat drafts as FPWDs

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:58:42 +0200
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <20100924195842373489.b011a2ee@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Sam Ruby, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:48:35 -0400:
> On 09/24/2010 10:59 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
>>>> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday,
>>>> September 22th, this resolution will carry.
>>> 
>>> Hearing no objections, the chairs will ask MikeSmith to work back
>>> with each of the document authors to prepare documents ready for
>>> publication.  The intent is to publish this set of drafts in early
>>> October.
>> 
>> I object to publishing the HTML5 spec and the Differences spec.
> 
> Out of order.
> 
>> Either the HTML5 spec must entirely drop the _vendor/vendor--
>> attributes.
> 
> We have a Decision Policy in effect, and you haven't even followed step 1:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic

You don't ask us per e-mail for objections, only to expect that we give 
the answer per bugzilla?

>> Or the HTML5 spec must mark it as controversial - as well as link it to
>> the outcome of ISSUE-41.
> 
> At the present time, the following sections are so marked:
> 
>   semantics-0 extensibility
> 
> Simply state what other sections (via their associated anchor tags) 
> you want marked, and I'll update the issue and this will be reflected 
> in the document on the web site the next time it is published.

The vendor--feature have no anchor. But all right, one may see it as 
covered by the header.

>> If the _vendor/vendor-- attributes are not removed, then the
>> Differences author is requested to familiarize himself with the content
>> of the HTML5 spec, and - thereafter - to update the Differences
>> document with information about the _vendor/vendor-- extensibility
>> solution.
>> 
>> I am willing to file bugs, if the chairs think it is necessary.
> 
> That IS the process.

> 
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?component=HTML5%20differences%20from%20HTML4%20%28editor%3A%20Anne%20van%20Kesteren%29&product=HTML%20WG

My last 3 bugs regarding that draft are unattended for many months. Is 
that also the process? There is no need to create more unattended bugs. 
If Anne attend to those bugs, then I can file new ones. Otherwise I 
expect him to handle this without any bug.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9991
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 17:59:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC