W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

RE: CfC: Publish eight heartbeat drafts as FPWDs

From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:44:41 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <104E6B5B6535E849970CDFBB1C5216EB3450520A@TK5EX14MBXC136.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Microsoft also supports publication.

On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:41 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I support publishing all these drafts. Though note that this doesn't
> necessarily agree with the technical contents of all of them.
> 
> / Jonas
> 
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new revisions of the
> > following documents in accordance with the Working Group Heartbeat
> > requirements, with a publish date in early October:
> >
> > HTML 5: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
> >
> > HTML+RDFa: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/
> >
> > HTML Microdata: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/
> >
> > HTML Canvas 2D Context: http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/
> >
> > HTML: The Markup Language: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/
> >
> > HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guidelines:
> > http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-
> guide.html
> >
> > HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives:
> > http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> >
> > Additionally, and as we have done with previous republications of the
> > HTML5 draft, the chairs would like to ask Anne to update the HTML5 diffs
> > from HTML4 to reflect the latest changes.
> >
> > http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/
> >
> > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
> > responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday,
> > September 22th, this resolution will carry.
> >
> > Considerations to note:
> >
> > - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be
> > complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on
> > the contents.
> > - Objections may be made on specific documents but not on others.
> > Counting the differences document, there are effectively eight different
> > documents under consideration at this time.
> >
> > - Sam Ruby
> >
> >
> 
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 19:45:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC