hi Paul, no I mean the html WG poll that is waiting on a repsonse from the chairs. related to this issue: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/109 regards steve On 9 September 2010 18:04, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > > there are 2 parts of the change proposal that are reflected in the > alternate spec text that were covered by another proposal ARIA section > proposal. > > Shouldn't you file bugs for these changes to ensure these parts are tracked > like all the other parts of the "alternate spec text"? > > Are there any other items in the "alternate spec text" not covered by the > already filed bugs? > > > This went to a poll. > > I assume you mean an A11Y TF poll. That is interesting since it tells us > what happened in the A11Y TF but is not sufficient rationale for the change > to be accepted automatically by the WG. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.htmlReceived on Thursday, 9 September 2010 18:10:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:04 UTC