W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 01:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1997402811.484398.1283762741983.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
David Singer wrote:
> I think that formal registries and Wikis are both useful.
> Formal registries can have well-defined entry criteria, expert review,
> stability, references/owners/specifications, and so on (if they wish).
> They can be trusted, stable.

Trusted by whom and for what purpose? Not by browser implementors or Web authors.

Who benefits from trusting that image/svg+xml doesn't exist (and presumably "cannot" be used) or from trusting that ISO-8859-1 isn't an alias for Windows-1252 when decoding?

I can see value in stability if something is stable and right. However, I don't understand why stability is appreciated when things are stable and known to be wrong. (Where "right" and "wrong" are defined in terms of actual interop--not in terms of the RFC canon.) 

Henri Sivonen
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 08:46:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:04 UTC