W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 16:06:14 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHYFHYr6ovhdWaZ6Q+FrPCUOF0HD6Wa8o1b0b-@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:49 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> Formal registries can have well-defined entry criteria, expert review, stability, references/owners/specifications, and so on (if they wish). They can be trusted, stable.  But the downside is that to gain that trust and stability they need those entry criteria and reviews.
>
> Wikis can be dynamic, open, up to date, and so on.  But the downside is that anyone can edit them, enter poorly-thought-out ideas, incorrect information, change existing state, and so on. To gain that dynamicity they lose trustability ("don't use Wikipedia as a primary reference" for example).

If the qualities you name are actually disadvantages of wikis (which
isn't clear), do you think it would be solvable by just using a wiki
alone, but clearly marking some versions of the page as stable and
reviewed, and others as unstable and unreviewed?  Wouldn't this be
more convenient than having a wiki plus some totally separate
mechanism?

> But much of the criticism of the registries has been off the mark, I think.  Registries do what they are asked to do; some community decides what the entrance/review criteria area, what needs to be documented, and so on, and then the registry helps keep the resulting database and to apply the agreed rules.  I think that much of this discussion has the feel of setting up strawmen and then coming to conclusions based on those strawmen.
>
> If the design of a registry is not appropriate for a community, then re-design it.

That's what we're doing.  The redesign some of us prefer is "a wiki".  :)
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 20:07:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC