W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:24:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4C81F433.30405@gmx.de>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 04.09.2010 01:54, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> ...
>> But much of the criticism of the registries has been off the mark, I think.  Registries do what they are asked to do; some community decides what the entrance/review criteria area, what needs to be documented, and so on, and then the registry helps keep the resulting database and to apply the agreed rules.  I think that much of this discussion has the feel of setting up strawmen and then coming to conclusions based on those strawmen.
>
> Right, registries are just fine.  The problem here is that the
> suggested registry isn't producing good results, for various reasons.
> ...

Yet.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 07:25:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:14 GMT