W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: OFFICIAL PROTEST - Current Editor's Draft MUST be a W3C document

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:22:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC89833.1020302@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org, "'Michael(tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, 'Philippe Le Hegaret' <plh@w3.org>, 'Judy Brewer' <jbrewer@w3.org>, jeff@w3.org
On 27.10.2010 23:21, Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> Thanks!
>
> I also would like to draw people's attention to the enhanced change
> control procedures[1] that Ian previously agreed to: "If any Working
> Group member sees a change go into any Last Call-track draft after the
> October 1st cutoff that seems controversial and likely to reduce rather
> than increase consensus, please let the Chairs know and we will make the
> call."
>
> It seems reasonable to conclude that is such a case, but I would like to
> be absolutely sure before proceeding, so if any working group member
> feels like this change needs to be reverted, please say so now.
>
>> Best regards, Julian
>
> - Sam Ruby

"So Now".

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 21:23:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:20 UTC