W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: getting rid of callers

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:09:36 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010130805570.8618@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> For HTMLFormElement, it seems only IE implements them.  Are they 
> >> really necessary to have in the spec?
> >
> > The real question is, is Microsoft willing to remove support for this 
> > feature? (in all modes, not just in some DOCTYPE-triggered ghetto)
> >
> > If not, then the simplest way of getting interop would be for everyone 
> > to just implement these features. They're not that much of a burden, 
> > surely?
> 
> This is clearly not the only qualification for if a feature should stay. 
> Or are you arguing we should add VML and vbscript to HTML5 as well?

There's a world of difference between supporting making an object callable 
and implementing an entire scripting language. I wouldn't expect the 
burden of implementing an entire scripting language to be a light thing.

Personally I just want interop. I don't really mind how we get there. I 
also acknowledge that the journey is long. We have to do it piecemeal.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 08:10:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:15 GMT