W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2010

Re: I18N feedback on Issue-88

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:08:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4BF63173.8060206@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 21.05.2010 00:56, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>> 3. It really is a requirement that HTML5 clearly specify if (and if so,
>> how the) HTTP Content-Language and/or the Content-Language pragma is
>> assigned to html@lang when html@lang is itself not present.
> Agreed regarding the pragma, but the HTTP header should be defined by the
> HTTP spec, not the HTML spec. I'm happy to provide relevant hooks to make
> this easier for the HTTP working group if the current text is insufficent.
> ...

The HTTP header *is* defined by the HTTP spec 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.14.12>); I'm 
not aware of any known issues with this part of the spec.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 07:09:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:02 UTC